High Court v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Court closed Sua Motu contempt proceedings against the Commissioner of Municipal Administration. The contemnor complied with earlier directions to submit pension proposals and encashment details, dispelling the need for further coercive measures.
What did the court decide?
Suo motu contempt proceedings closed upon compliance by the contemnor.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.06.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
Suo-Motu Cont.P.No.1051 of 2015
The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai. .. Contemnor * * *
Suo Motu Contempt proceedings initiated against the Contemnor as per order dated 28.04.2015 made in W.P.No.9896 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015.
- *
For Contemner : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan
Special Govt. Pleader
- *
ORDER
For the disobedience of the directions issued by this Court in W.P.No.9896 of 2015, this Court initiated Suo Motu Contempt proceedings against the Contemnor as per order dated 28.04.2015 made in W.P.No.9896 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015.
- This contempt petition came up for hearing on
Parties & counsel
- other
Mr. V.Jayaprakash Narayanan
Coram
D.Hariparantchan
Justice D.Hariparantchan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court