K.P.Ramasamy v. Sabitha
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought punishment for disobedience of a 2012 order. Respondents submitted that compliance had been effected with production of proceedings. Court held no adjudication required and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
No further adjudication required; petition closed due to compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 03.03.2015
Coram
The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU
Contempt Petition No.3237 of 2013
K.P.Ramasamy
... Petitioner
-Versus-
1.Mrs.Sabitha
State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. By The Secretary to the Government,
School Education Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai 600 009.
2.Mr.Rameswara Murugan,
Director of School Education
[Higher Secondary],
College Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006.
3.Mrs.Thiruvalar Selvi,
Chief Educational Officer,
Karur, Karur District.
... Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for having willfully disobeyed the order of this court dated 09.10.2012 made in W.P.No.27231 of 2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Thirupathi For Respondents : Mr.N.Sakthivel Government Advocate [Writs]
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be adjudicated upon given the submission of compliance by the respondents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.P.Ramasamy
- respondent
Mrs.Sabitha
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Mr.Rameswara Murugan
- respondent
Mrs.Thiruvalar Selvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court