S.Chellammal v. Sabitha
Case brief
What is this about?
The court records that respondents complied with the impugned order and credited the claimed amount into the petitioner's account. Consequently, the contempt petition is closed without further adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition is closed as the order was complied with.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 03.03.2015
Coram
The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU
Contempt Petition No.3236 of 2013
S.Chellammal
... Petitioner
-Versus-
1.Mrs.Sabitha
State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. By The Secretary to the Government,
School Education Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai 600 009.
2.Mr.Rameswara Murugan,
Director of School Education
[Higher Secondary],
College Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006.
3.Mr.Sugumar Devadoss,
Chief Educational Officer,
Dindigul, Dindigul District.
... Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for having willfully disobeyed the order of this court dated 09.10.2012 made in W.P.No.27116 of 2012. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Thirupathi
For Respondents : Mr.N.Sakthivel
Government Advocate [Writs]
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Chellammal
- respondent
Mrs.Sabitha
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Mr.Rameswara Murugan
- respondent
Mr.Sugumar Devadoss
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court