S.Rajan v. M.Tamilselvan
Case brief
What is this about?
The contempt petition was closed as the impugned notice was withdrawn by the respondent's letter dated 13.2.2015, thereby complying with the earlier order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 02.3.2015
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Contempt Petition No.239 of 2015 & Sub.A.No.46 of 2015
S.Rajan ...Petitioner
Vs
Mr.M.Tamilselvan, Executive Officer,
Ulundurpet Town Panchayat,
Ulundurpet, Villupuram District. ...Respondent
PETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to
punish the respondent for committing willful contempt of the
order passed on 10.12.2014 made in W.P.No.32261 of 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran
For Respondents : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, GA
ORDER
Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, learned Government Advocate produced a copy of the letter dted 13.2.2015 issued by the Executive Officer of the Town Panchayat to the District Manager, THADCO withdrawing the notice impugned in the writ petition. Thus, the order has been complied with.
2
- Therefore, the contempt petition is closed. Consequently,
the above Sub.Application is also closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Rajan
- respondent
Mr.M.Tamilselvan
Coram
V.Ramasubramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court