The High Court held that since the respondent filed the contempt petitions complied with the earlier order, the Contempt Petitions were closed. The petitions filed under Section 11 were disposed of without any further notice.
Contempt Petitions Cont.P.Nos.2174 and 2175 of 2014 were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.03.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN
Cont.P.Nos.2174 and 2175 of 2014
M.Chellapangi ... Petitioner in
Cont.P.No.2174 of 2014
S.Vadivel ... Petitioner in
Cont.P.No.2175 of 2014
Vs.
Mr.A.Munusamy
Tahsildar,
Kallakurichi Taluk,
Villupuram District. ... Respondent
in both petitions
Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act to punish the respondent herein for his willful
disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court
dated 29.04.2013 in W.P.Nos.12470 and 12471 of 2013
respectively.
For Petitioners: Mr.R.Kumaravel For Respondent : Mr.I.Arockiasamy
Government Advocate
2
C O M M O N O R D E R
The respondent has complied with the direction issued by this Court.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Petitions should be closed after the respondent's compliance with the order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Chellapangi
S.Vadivel
Mr.A.Munusamy
K.K.SASIDHARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
