In a contempt petition for willful disobedience, the Single Judge closed the proceeding with liberty to revive it, noting that full payment was made but subsequent instructions prevented cheque presentation, and the respondent stated further dues were due in January 2016.
Proceeding closed with liberty to revive in case of any difficulty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.12.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Limited, having its registered Office at No.123, Angappa Naicken Street, Chennai, rep. by its Authorised Signatory A.Vinolin. ... Petitioner
R.Lakshmi Narasimha Moorthy, No.62, 4th Floor, 3rd Street, Abiramapuram, Chennai-600 018. ... Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Sections 11 of the Contempt of Courts, Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in O.S.A.No.55 of 2015, dated 12.03.2015.
For Respondent .. Mr.R.Lakshmi Narasimha Moorthy Respondent-in-person
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Full payment has been made, though according to the
learned counsel for the petitioner in respect of the last cheque instructions were received not to present the same https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
by the respondent. The respondent present in Court states
2
that the said cheque is good for payment and can be presented.
has to be paid in January, 2016.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceeding should be closed in view of full payment and subsequent instructions regarding cheque presentation.
What relief the petitioner is entitled to considering the respondent's representation regarding the cheque and future dues.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Limited
R.Lakshmi Narasimha Moorthy
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
M.M.Sundresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
