R. Manickam v. the Zonal Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition seeking punishment for wilful disobedience of a previous order, the court closed the petition granted liberty to the petitioner to approach higher courts as the impugned order was under stay in a writ appeal.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed with liberty to seek further remedy subject to the outcome of the writ appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 18.03.2015
Coram :
The Honourable MS.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI
CONTEMPT PETITION No.141 OF 2015 R.Manickam .. Petitioner Vs The Zonal Officer, State Bank of India, No.206, Melur Road, Madurai-625 002 Now known as Mr.S.Narasiman, Regional Manager, [Zonal Officer], State Bank of India, Regional Office-II, Dr.Ambedkar Road, Madurai-2. .. Respondent PETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.No.15031 of 2005 dated 28.04.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar
For Respondent : Mr.S.Kanniah
O R D E R
Both the learned counsel on record are present and are heard.
- In view of the submission made by the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Manickam
- respondent
The Zonal Officer, State Bank of India
Coram
K.B.K. Vasuki
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court