Allowed

The Managing Director v. Shenbagavalli

Madras HC6 Feb 2015CMA/242/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Lok Adalat award settled a dispute regarding a motor accident claim. The Transport Corporation appealed an earlier award of @ Rs.8,98,000. Via compromise, the award was reduced to Rs.8,89,379 to accommodate medical expenses for a mentally retarded minor child.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was disposed of. The claim amount was reduced to Rs.8,89,379. Rs.3,00,000 directed to be deposited for the minor.

The Managing Director Vs Shenbagavalli — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI

¶2

Lok Adalat-II organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee

¶3

Friday, the 06^th day of February, 2015

¶4

LOK ADALAT AWARD (Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶5

Presided over by

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE T.N.VALLINAYAGAM(Retd.)

¶7

and

¶8

Members Mr. A. Selvadoss Mrs. Daniel Mary C.M.A. No.242 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 (Appeal against the award and decree passed on 17.04.2014 made in M.C.O.P.No.2717 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Additional District Judge), Cuddalore)

¶9

The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam Division-I) Ltd., Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam-612 001 ... Appellant/1st Respondent Vs. 1. Shenbagavalli 2.Minor Rajeshkumar ( rep. by his mother and next friend, Shenbagavalli) 3.Dhanam ... Respondents/Petitioners 1 & 2/2nd Respondent

¶10

On representation of the learned counsel for the claimants, this case is taken up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. The learned counsel for the appellant, Mr.D.Venkatachalam and the learned counsel for the respondents, Mr.N. Udhayakumar are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶13

The Transport Corporation has preferred the present appeal aggrieved against the award of Rs.8,98,000/- with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of petition till the date of payment.

¶14

After due deliberation and consultation, both the parties have agreed to modify the award for Rs.8,65,000/- for award and Rs.24,379/- for costs, totally Rs.8,89,379/- in full quit. The lower court has apportioned the award in favour of the widow of the deceased at Rs.4,00,000/- and the minor/second respondent at Rs.3,00,000/- and second respondent/mother of the deceased who was impleaded as a party at Rs.1,98,000/-.

¶15

Now, it is represented that the minor is a mentally retarded child and his grandmother namely, third respondent is prepared to give up her share in favour of the minor for the purpose of meeting medical expenses. Therefore, the apportionment shall be as follows:

¶16

The first respondent, widow of the deceased is permitted to withdraw Rs.4,00,000/- plus Rs.1,89,379/- which is the share of the third respondent, Dhanam.

¶17

A sum of Rs.3,00,000/- shall be deposited in any one of the nationalised banks in the name of he minor till he attains majority. The mother of the minor, who is the legal guardian is entitled to withdraw interest quarterly for the benefit of the minor.

¶18

The Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the modified award amount, less the amount already deposited, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such deposit, the first respondent/claimant is permitted to withdraw her respective share as stated above. On attaining the age of majority, minor respondent- 2 is permitted to withdraw his respective shares on production of age proof certificate before the tribunal. Award is modified accordingly.

¶19

The Tribunal is directed to issue the cheques to the parties concerned on proper identification in accordance with the terms of the award, without insisting on any formal permission

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

petition. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

Sd/-
The Managing Director,
Tamilnadu State Transport
Corporation (Kumbakonam Division-I) Ltd.,
Railway Station New Road, Sd/-
Kumbakonam-612 001 Counsel for the Appellant
Sd/-
1. Shenbagavalli
Sd/-
2.Minor Rajeshkumar
( rep. by his mother and next friend,
Shenbagavalli)
Sd/- Sd/-
3.Dhanam Counsel for the respondents
This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above
settlement.
The Court fee paid shall be refunded to the parties in the
manner provided under the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under
sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.
sd/-
Judge
sd/- sd/-
Member Member
Sd/-
Asst. Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

The parties/Advocate concerned

¶26

Copy to:1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (First Additional District Judge), Cuddalore. 2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai. 3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. 4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras. +2copies

¶27

C.M.A. No.242 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 SKV(co) PU 25.2.15

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Managing Director v. Shenbagavalli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Managing Director v. Shenbagavalli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Icici Lombard General Vs Rajalakshmi

V.Vijayakumar Vs Mr.S.Mohammed Kasim

Nandagopal Vs Sulochanammal

Tamilnadu State Transport Vs the Presiding Officer

M.Dinesh Kumar Vs the Registrar

S.Sindhuja Vs the Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical