Dismissed

J.Justin Sacraties, v. the Director of Medical and

Madras HC8 Jul 2014WP(MD)/11069/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order denying transfer. Upon counsel's application, the petitioner withdrew the plea with liberty to pursue representation, leading to the dismissal of the writ as withdrawn and closure of connected petitions.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to pursue representation allowed; connected petitions closed.

J.Justin Sacraties, Vs the Director of Medical and — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 08.07.2014

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.11069 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014

¶7

J.Justin Sacraties : Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service,

¶10

Chennai-600 006.

¶11

The Joint Director of Health Service,

¶12

Theni @ Periyakulam District.

¶13

The Hospital Superintendent, Government Head Quarters Hospital, Periyakulam, Theni District.

¶14

The Superintendent,

¶15

Office of Medical and Rural Health

¶16

Service, Chennai-600 006. : Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent in ref No.38991/E5/2/2014 dated 26.06.2014 served on the petitioner on 02.07.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to permit the petitioner to continue in the present place.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement

¶21

indicating that he is withdrawing the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation said to have been given to the first respondent through the second respondent.

¶22

In view of the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the representation said to have been given on 02.07.2014 to the first respondent through the second respondent.

¶23

Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No Costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

/True Copy/

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service, Chennai-600 006.

¶30

The Joint Director of Health Service, Theni @ Periyakulam District.

¶31

The Hospital Superintendent, Government Head Quarters Hospital, Periyakulam, Theni District.

¶32

The Superintendent, Office of Medical and Rural Health Service, Chennai-600 006.

¶33

+1cc to Mr. J.Anand Kumar,Advocate in SR.No. 37226 TS/15.07.2014/2P-6c

¶34

W.P.(MD)No.11069 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 08.07.2014

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J.Justin Sacraties, v. the Director of Medical and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Justin Sacraties, v. the Director of Medical and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Mohan Vs the Registrar

M/S Packirisamy Unloading Vs the Union of India, through

Sri Esanya Sivachariar Vs C.Ramakrishna Mudaliar

V.Sundaravel, Vs the Joint Registrar of

K.Kanagaraj Vs the Commandant

N. Lakshmi Vs the Chairman Cum