The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to trace and return original title deeds. The petitioner applied to withdraw the petition, which was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the writ.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.12.2014
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Writ Petition No.30206 of 2014
R.Vinayagamoorthy (a) Vinayagam ...Petitioner
Vs
PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith trace and return the original title deed filed as exhibits on the file of XV Small Causes Court, Chennai in R.C.O.P.No.1825 of 2004.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.E.K.Kumaresan
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Registrar General, High Court, Chennai-104.
2.The Registrar Vigilance, High Court, Chennai-104.
3.The Registrar, Small Causes Court, Chennai-104.
1 CC to Mr.L.Chandrakumar, Advocate SR.No. 59402 WP.No.30206 of 2014
RJ (CO) PSI (18.12.2014)
R. Vinayagamoorthy
The Registrar General, High Court, Chennai
The Registrar Vigilance, High Court Chennai
The Registrar, Small Causes Court, Chennai
V. Ramasubramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
