K.A. Victoria v. The State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Madras dismissed W.P. and M.P. directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to dispose of a petitioner's representation via a speaking order after due notice within one month, thereby disposing of the writ petitions.
What did the court decide?
Directed respondents to dispose of petitioner's representation via speaking order after notice within one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.09.2014
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
W.P.No.23519 of 2014
and M.P.No.1 of 2014
K.A.Victoria .. Petitioner
vs
1.The State,
rep. By Member Secretary,
CMDA, Chennai.
2.The Commissioner,
Chennai Corporation,
Rippon Building, Chennai.
3.Manjula Bai
4.Anita Manavat ..Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1 st and 2 nd
respondents to dispose of petitioner's representation dated
30.04.2014 by conducting an enquiry in accordance with law and on
merits.
For Petitioner .. Mr.S.Namonarayanan
For Respondents .. Mr.C.Johnson for R-1 .. Mr.G.Anantha Rangan for R-2
Mr.C.Johnson, learned counsel, accepts notice for the first respondent and Mr.G.Anantha Rangan, learned counsel, accepts notice for the second respondent.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether 1st and 2nd respondents must dispose of petitioner's representation dated 30.04.2014 by conducting an enquiry in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.A.Victoria
- respondent
The State, rep. By Member Secretary, CMDA, Chennai
- respondent
The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation
- respondent
Manjula Bai
- respondent
Anita Manavat
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court