Haji v. Bhaskar
Case brief
What is this about?
In three second appeals (Nos. 1079-1081 of 2008) challenging judgments regarding property disputes, the court dismissed the appeals as settled out of court based on a joint filed Memo of Compromise between the parties.
What did the court decide?
Duplicate Appeals Nos. 1079 and 1080 dismissed as withdrawn; Appeal No. 1081 dismissed as settled; Memorandum of Compromise taken on record.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 08.12.2014
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.MAHADEVAN
Second Appeal Nos.1079 to 1081 of 2008
Second Appeal No.1079 of 2008
Haji R.M.Ibrahim ... Appellant/ Plaintiff for himself and the Muslim people of Kovalam
vs. 1.Bhaskar ...1st Respondent / I Respondent in AS 2.Board of Trustees, Kovalam Dharga and Mosque, Represented by its President Copros Complex, P.P.No.8614, Chennai 41. ...2nd Respondent/ 5th Defendant
The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 13.06.2006 passed in A.S.No.16 of 2001 on the file of the Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court No.1)Chengalpattu, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 28.06.2001 passed in O.S.No.243 of 1984 on the file of the District Munsif, Chengalpattu.
Second Appeal No.1080 of 2008
Haji R.M.Ibrahim for himself and the Muslim people of kovalam ... Appellant/ Plaintiff vs. 1.Stalin ...1st Respondent/5th respondent
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Haji R.M.Ibrahim
- respondent
Bhaskar
- respondent
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, KOVARAM DHARGA AND MOSQUE
- respondent
Stalin
- respondent
PALAGAI KOTTI RAJI
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court