The court allowed a revision petition filed against an order dismissing a second appeal, holding that the second appeal was consequently resolved. The order contains no substantive legal reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.NO.362 OF 2013 IN
S.A.NO.723 OF 2005
RMDJ
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This petition has been filed seeking an order to set aside the order of dismissal dated 25/03/2013 in the above Second Appeal.
Having considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is allowed and the second appeal is resolved.
09.12.2014
kal/rvr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition filed under CMP No. 362 of 2013 under S.A. No. 723 of 2005 against the order of dismissal dated 25/03/2013 deserves to be allowed.
RMDJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
