A. Suganthi v. v. Srisuresh
Case brief
What is this about?
Wife filed Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 to expedite husband's pending divorce trial, alleging wanton abandonment and unreasoned adjournments. Court allowed petition, directing trial court to conclude proceedings in three months.
What did the court decide?
Directed Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.211 of 2013 within three months from receipt of order.
What the court decided
1
A.Suganthi
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 09.04.2014 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN
C.R.P(MD)No.821 of 2014 (PD)
.. Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
V.Srisuresh .. Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli to expedite the Trial in H.M.O.P.No.211 of 2013, within time frame as may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karnan
ORDER
The petitioner is seeking a direction to the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli to expedite the trial and dispose of H.M.O.P.No.211 of 2013 within the specified time as may be fixed by this Court.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this Court should direct the Principal Subordinate Judge to expedite the trial of the pending divorce petition.
Whether the trial court should dispose of the matrimonial proceedings within a fixed time frame.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Suganthi
- respondent
V.Srisuresh
Coram
T.Mathivanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court