Allowed
Subbaraj, v. Shanthi
Madras HCCRP(MD)/72/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Revision petition under Article 227(1). Court directed lower court to dispose of interlocutory application within 15 days due to urgency.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Principal District Munsif, Aruppukottai to dispose of I.A.No.949 of 2013 within 15 days.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED: 08.04.2014
¶4
Coram:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN
¶6
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.72 of 2014
¶7
Subbaraj
¶8
... Petitioner
¶9
vs.
¶10
- Shanthi
¶11
- The President, Mandapasalai Village Panchayat, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
¶12
- The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, Muthuramalingapuram, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
¶13
... Respondents
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Subbaraj
- respondent
Shanthi
- respondent
The President, Mandapasalai Village Panchayat
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court