Manoharan v. Mrs.Kanmani
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench directed the Judicial Magistrate, Kovilpatti, to expedite the petitioner's complaint under Cr.P.C. 482 due to human rights considerations.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti to expedite the petitioner's complaint dated 23.07.2013.
What the court decided
1
Manoharan
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.04.2014 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4176 of 2014
.... Petitioner/Complainant
Vs.
1.Kanmani
2.Krishnaveni
3.Subbuthai 4.Thulasi Lakshmi
5.Nallathambi .... Respondents/Accused
Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti to expedite the petitioner's complaint dated 23.07.2013 in Cr.M.P.No.5674 of 2013 and to take on file in accordance with law within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Judicial Magistrate should be directed to expedite the taking of a complaint on file as it involves human rights.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoharan
- respondent
Kanmani
- respondent
Krishnaveni
- respondent
Subbuthai
- respondent
Thulasi Lakshmi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court