A.Rajasekaran v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.02.2014
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM
Crl.O.P(MD)No.21839 of 2013
1.A.Rajasekaran 2.M.P.Azhagumalai
4.Sivaperumal
5.Sathananthan :Petitioners/A1 to A5
vs.
1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nilakottai,
Dindigul District. : 1st Respondent/Complainant
2.Maheswari : 2nd Respondent/De-facto Complainant
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai, Dindigul District, in C.C.No.332 of 2009 and quash the same.
For Petitioners : Ms.S.Jainab Beevi
for Mr.M.Vivekandan
For 1st Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan
Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
The learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
er
To,
1.The Judicial Magistrate, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Nilakottai, Dindigul District.
2
2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1CC to Mr.M.Vivekandan,Advocate in SR.No. 8618
Crl.O.P(MD)No.21839 of 2013 12.11.2013
rg.18/02/2014 2p.5c.
A.Rajasekaran
A1 to A5
The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nilakottai, Dindigul District
Maheswari
G. Chockalingam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court