Allowed

Natarajan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC4 Sept 2014CRL OP(MD)/16329/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of alleged offences where no injury was sustained. Bail was secured with a bond and daily appearance conditions for one petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail after executing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties; first petitioner to appear daily at 10.00 a.m. for one week.

Natarajan Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of September Two Thousand Fourteen PRESENT

¶2

The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶3

CRL OP(MD) No.16329 of 2014

¶4

1 NATARAJAN 2 SARANYA 3 JEGATHEESWARI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3

¶5

THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BOOTHAPANDI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DIST CRIME NO.373 OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶6

For Petitioner : M/S.M.SANKAR Advocate

¶7

For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶8

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶9

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶10

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 434, 294 (b), 506(ii) of IPC., in Cr.No.373 of 2014 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶11

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offences and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

¶12

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence.

¶13

Considering the nature of allegation and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandi and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ a.m., for a period of one week and thereafter, as and when required and the petitioners 2 & 3 shall appear before the respondent police

¶14

as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶15

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶16

sd/-

¶17

04/09/2014

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶19

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶20

Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

¶22

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BOOTHAPANDI

¶23

2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL

¶24

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BOOTHAPANDI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DIST

¶25

4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶26

+1. CC to M/S.M.SANKAR Advocate SR.No.49843

¶27

ORDER

¶28

¶29

CRL OP(MD) No.16329 of 2014 Date :04/09/2014

¶30

NA/05/09/2014/P2/6C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Natarajan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Natarajan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thirumalai Ammal Vs the Inspector of Police

G.S. Mohanraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Vimala Vs the Inspector of Police

Ganesan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

K. Jeyaprakash Vs the Inspector of Police

V.Sanjeevi Vs the Inspector of Police