Sriya Pushpam Escalin v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. as withdrawn, following the endorsement of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Third day of June Two Thousand Fourteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN
CRL OP(MD) No.10490 of 2014
SRIYA PUSHPAM ESCALIN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.6
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.33 OF 2014
... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : MR.C.MAYIL VAHANA RAJENDRAN, Addl.Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/-
23/06/2014 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD) No.10490 of 2014 Date :23/06/2014
msm 26.06.2014 p1/3c
SRIYA PUSHPAM ESCALIN
THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH
R.S. Ramathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court