A.V. Radha Krishnan v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner in anticipatory bail petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation was filed on scheduled dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twentieth day of June Two Thousand Fourteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN
CRL OP(MD) No.1031 of 2014
A.V. RADHA KRISHNAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED A1
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALANKANALLUR POLICE STATION, VADIPATTI TALUK, MADURAI DT, CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.P.MUTHUDURAI Advocate
For Respondent : MR.C.MAYIL VAHANA RAJENDRAN Addl.Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
There was no representation for the petitioner on 08.04.2014, 29.04.2014, 04.06.2014 and today also there is no representation for the petitioner, hence the petitioner is dismissed for non prosecution.
sd/20/06/2014 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.1031 of 2014 Date :20/06/2014 AA/25.06.2014/1p- 3c/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.V. Radha Krishnan
State Rep by the Inspector of Police Alankanallur
R.S. Ramathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court