G.Mohammed Sheriff v. Mrs.Sabitha
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition filed under Section 11, the applicant sought punishment for the respondents' alleged willful disobedience of a prior court order. The respondents confirmed compliance with the said order, leading the court to close the petition without further adjudication.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition stands closed as the impugned order has been complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.09.2014
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN
Contempt Petition No.792 of 2014 G.Mohammed Sheriff ..Petitioner vs. 1.Mrs.Sabitha The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By the Secretary to the Government, School Education Department, Fot St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.Mr.Rameswara Murugan, The Director of School Education, ((Higher Secondary) College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006. 3.Mr.Ramasamy The Chief Educational Officer, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. .. Respondents
Prayer:- Petiton filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court to punish the respondents for the willful disobedience of the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.14898/2011 dated 23.04.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Thirupathi For Respondents : Mr.N.Sakthivel, Government Advocate
2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be disposed of as the impugned order has been complied with?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.Mohammed Sheriff
- respondent
The State of Tamil Nadu
Coram
R.S.Ramanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court