The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the prayer had become infructuous and endorsed the fact.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.04.2013
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN
W.P.(MD)No.3383 of 2013
L.Pandi : Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram.
2.The District Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.
4.The Assistant Superintendent of Police,
Kamudhi, Ramanathapuram District.
5.The Tahsildar,
Kamudhi, Ramanathapuram District.
6.The Inspector of Police, Perunali Police Station, Ramanathapuram.
7.V.Ramachandran
[R-7 impleaded as per order dated 18.03.2013 in M.P.No.1 of 2013]
: Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to enable the petitioner and his family members to participate in the village and temple festival takes place from 07.03.2013 to 10.03.2013 by paying their family taxes to the headman of the second karai of his Kadamangalam Village.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkateswaran
For Respondents1to6 : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan
Additional Government Pleader
For Respondent 7 : Mr.C.Vakeeswaran
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2
L.Pandi
The District Collector, Ramanathapuram
The District Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi
The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Kamudhi
The Tahsildar, Kamudhi
K.K.Sasidharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
