Dismissed

M/S. Vasantham Catering, v. the Senior Divisional

Madras HC17 Apr 2013WP(MD)/1422/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ to direct respondents to award a license for a light refreshment stall. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to challenge the subsequent contract issued to another party.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge subsequent contract issued to the fifth respondent.

M/S. Vasantham Catering, Vs the Senior Divisional — Property and Title | Madras HC (2013)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.04.2013

¶3

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN

¶4

W.P(MD)No.1422 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013

¶5

M/s.Vasantham Catering, Rep. By its Proprietor, No.137/18, St.Paul's Complex, 'A' Block, Bharathiar Street, Cantonment Road, Trichirappalli, Trichirappalli District – 620 001. ... Petitioner Vs.

¶6

1.The Senior Divisional commercial Manager Divisional Office, Commercial Branch, Madurai – 625 016.

¶7

2.The Screening Committee for the Application No.U/79/New Stalls/ III/D, E & F dated 06.12.2010 Divisional Office, Commercial Branch, Madurai – 625 016.

¶8

3.The Office Superintendent, Catering Branch, Madurai Divisional, Madurai – 625 016.

¶9

4.Babu

¶10

5.Balasubramanian 6.The Axis Bank, Rep. By its Senior Manager, No.4, Goods Shed Street, Madurai – 625 001. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to consider forthwith the petitioner's application for the award of Licence for running the vegetarian light refreshment stall at platform No.1 at Manamadurai in Madurai Railway Division.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.Issac Mohanlal

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.S.Manohar

¶15

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the subsequent contract issued to the fifth respondent.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an

¶19

endorsement indicating that he is withdrawing this Writ Petition.

¶20

In view of the endorsement so made, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Deputy Registrar (Accounts)

/True Copy/

Assistant Registrar

1.The Senior Divisional commercial Manager Divisional Office, Commercial Branch,Madurai – 625 016.

¶27

2.The Screening Committee for the

¶28

Application No.U/79/New Stalls/

¶29

III/D, E & F dated 06.12.2010 Divisional Office, Commercial Branch,

¶30

Madurai – 625 016.

¶31

+1CC to Mr.S.Manohar,Advocate in SR.No.91604

¶32

+1CC to Mr.S.Jayakumar,Advocate in SR.No.21767

¶33

+1CC to Mr.Isaac Mohanlal,Advocate in SR.No.21739

¶34

W.P(MD)No.1422 of 2013

¶35

17.04.2013

¶36

rg.30.04.2013 2P/6C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S. Vasantham Catering, v. the Senior Divisional

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Vasantham Catering, v. the Senior Divisional

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Ganapathy, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Devi Corporation,a Partnership Vs the Superintendent of Police

V. Ponnazhagu, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

V. Soundaravalli Vs the District Collector

M. Sappani @ Ramasami Servai, Vs Tamil Nadu Water Supply and

M/S. Cholamandalam Vs the District Revenue Officer