Disposed

M/S.Srilakshmi v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Madras HC11 Jan 2013WP/984/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of a petition under Section 22(6) of the TNVAT Act, 2006 for a fresh self-assessment order. The Court directed the respondent to consider the petition if no prior order was passed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to consider the petition filed under Section 22(6) of the TNVAT Act, 2006, if in order and no order has been passed, as expeditiously as possible.

M/S.Srilakshmi Vs the Commercial Tax Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 11.1.2013

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR

¶5

W.P.No.984 of 2013

¶6

M/s.Sri Lakshmi Ram Auto Spares, represented by its Proprietor R.Ramasamy, No.5/489, SKM Complex, Kalingarayanpalayam, Erode. ... Petitioner Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Chithode Assessment Circle, Erode. ... Respondent

¶7

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pass a fresh assessment order for the assessment year 2011-2012 by disposing of the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 22(6) of the TNVAT Act, 2006 dated 30.11.2012 as expeditiously as possible.

¶8

This writ petition has been filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pass a fresh assessment order for the assessment year 2011-2012 by disposing of the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 22(6) of the TNVAT Act, 2006 dated 30.11.2012 as expeditiously as possible.

¶9

Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent. By consent the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

The self assessment order for the year 2011-12 has been passed in terms of Section 22 of the TNVAT Act, 2006. Realising certain mistakes in the assessment, petitioner made an application under Section 22(6) of the TNVAT Act, 2006 with enclosures and that was filed on 30.11.2012. Since no fresh assessment order has been passed, the writ petition has been filed for a mandamus as above.

¶12

Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Government Advocate states that if no order has already been passed, the authority will consider the same in accordance with law.

¶13

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the respondent is directed to consider the petition filed under Section 22(6) of the TNVAT Act, 2006 if it is in order and no order has already been passed, as expeditiously as possible.

¶14

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/ Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar ts To

¶15

The Commercial Tax Officer, Chithode Assessment Circle, Erode.

¶16

+1 CC to Mrs.R.Hemalatha, Advocate SR 23581 +1 CC to Special Government Pleader,(TAxes), SR 2810

¶17

WP No.984 of 2013 BS(CO) PKS 24/01/2013

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Srilakshmi v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Srilakshmi v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Nakshatra Service Vs the Assistant Commissioner(Ct

P.Vijayabhaskar, Vs the Tahsildhar

M/S.Caravel Logistics Pvt. Vs the Joint Secretary (Ra)

Transstroy (India) Limited, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Jameel Trading Company Vs the Appellate Assistant

M/S.Anmol Rajendra Parcel Vs the Deputy Commercial Tax