This is an order dismissing a habeas corpus petition filed by U.Lingam to produce his brother, Muniasamy. The petitioner promptly appeared to identify the detenu, making the petition infructuous as the purpose was achieved ex-parte.
Habeas corpus petition dismissed as infructuous due to production and identification of the detenu.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.02.2013
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD) No.114 of 2013
U.Lingam
.. Petitioner
vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.
6.Pandi
.. Respondents
Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the detenu, Muniasamy, aged about 26 years before this Court and set him at liberty and pass such further or other orders.
For Petitioner : M/s.A.Rajini
For Respondents : Mr.A.Ramar, 1 and 2 Addl. Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J)
This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the detenu by name Muniasamy, who is none other than the brother of the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2
Muniasamy and he has been identified by the petitioner.
relief sought for in the Habeas Corpus Petition has become infructuous and therefore this Habeas Corpus Petition deserves to be dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
smn
RL/4c - 25/2/2013
H.C.P(MD)No.114 of 2013
14.02.2013
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the habeas corpus petition should be allowed after the detenu was produced and identified by the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
U.Lingam
Superintendent of Police
Inspector of Police
R.Rajammal
R.Manikandan
R.Jeyalakshmi
A.Selvam
M.Sathyanarayanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
