Habeas Corpus petition filed praying for production of petitioner's daughter. Second respondent produced the detenue and she was identified by petitioner, rendering the petition infructuous.
Habeas Corpus Petition dismissed on grounds of being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.02.2013
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
HABEAS CORPUS PETITION No.131 of 2013
Pushpam
.. Petitioner
vs.
4.Muralidharan .. Respondents
Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the detenue Miss.Parameswari, D/o.Kannan, aged about 21 years, before this Court and set her at liberty from the illegal custody of the 3rd and 4th respondents and pass such further or other orders.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothi Basu
For Respondents : Mr.A.Ramar, 1 and 2 Addl.Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J)
This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the detenue by name Parameswari, who is none other than the daughter of the petitioner.
2
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
smn
To
+1cc to the Mr.G.Mari Muthu,Advocate Sr No.6534
H.C.P(MD)No.131 of 2013
13.02.2013
rg.27/02/2013 2p/5c
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Habeas Corpus petition praying for production of the detenue deserves dismissal since she has already been produced and identified.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pushpam
Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District
Sub-Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai
Arun Pandian
Muralidharan
A.Selvam
M.SathyanaRamanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
