R.Ranjhini v. K.Kumaradev
Case brief
What is this about?
In a property suit, the Civil Court at Madras recorded a mediation settlement between the plaintiff and defendants. The court decreed the suit incorporating the terms of the agreement which divided properties and severed joint family status.
What did the court decide?
Properties were allotted to parties as per mediation agreement; joint family status severed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16-8-2013
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN
C.S.No.28 of 2012
R.Ranjhini
.. Plaintiff.
- Versus
- K.Kumaradev 2. K.Kailasanathan 3. V.Bhuvaneswari 4. R.Vidyavathi 5. R.Ramani 6. S.Thavamani 7. S.Selvam 8. K.Siddarth .. defendants.
Prayer: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule I CPC Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to 1/5th share in Schedule A' and Schedule B' properties and for other reliefs.
For Plaintiffs : Mr.Aiyar and Dolia and V.Kalyanaram For defendants : M/s.Ram and Rajan Association T.K.Ramkumar, R.S.Varadarajan S.Badrudeen (D1, 2,5,6 and 8) Mr.D.Saravana and S.Alamelu (D3) Mr.R.Subramanian, B.Ravi, S.S.Raghavan (R4) Mr.K.V.Muthu Visakan, S.Thambi, Mr.Nirmalkumar (D7)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil suit for partition and declaration of share in properties should be decreed based on the settlement reached during mediation.
Validity of the division of Schedule B property among the litigants as per the mediation agreement.
Coram
M.Jaichandren
J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court