The Madurai Bench directed the petitioner to file a representation with the second respondent to determine entitlement to 8th Bipartite settlement pay, to be decided within eight weeks, without expressing an opinion on merits.
Directed the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation on pay scale within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.08.2013
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN
W.P.(MD) No.13550 of 2011 & M.P(MD).No.1 of 2011
N.Jayakumar : Petitioner
Versus
1.The Managing Director, State Bank of Travancore, Head Office, Poojappura, Thiruvananthapuram-695 012, Kerala State.
2.The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of Travancore, Zonal Office, Guna Complex, 304/305, Annasalai Teynampet, Chennai-600 018. : Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to fix my pay scale at the basic pay of Rs.14,330/- as per 8th Bipartite settlement scale with effect from 27.08.2008 and also pay all the increments and other benefits to me.
For Petitioner : M/s.Christenson Jugunu For Respondents : Mr.S.Sethuraman **********
O R D E R
Heard M/s.Christenson Jugunu, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as Mr.S.Sethuraman, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.
2
counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the second respondent shall dispose of the said representation, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks. However, it is made clear, that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to Mr.S.Sethuraman Advocate SR.No. 40179.
+1cc to Mr.D.Christen Son Joguna Advocate SR.No. 40070.
TS/05.09.2013/2P-5C
W. P.(MD) No.13550 of 2011
Dated:- 07.08.2013
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the pay scale under the 8th Bipartite settlement.
Whether the Writ Petition requires adjudication on merits or mere relief via representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Jayakumar
The Managing Director, State Bank of Travancore
The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of Travancore
M. Jaichandren
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
