R.Murugesan v. Pavayee
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel reported an amicable settlement between the parties. No costs awarded.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 02.08.2013
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
C.R.P (NPD) No.3519 of 2012
and M.P.No.1 of 2011
1.R.Murugesan
2.M.Srinivasan ... Petitioners/Petitioners/
Impleading parties
-vs-
1.Pavayee
2.Eswaran
3.Amutha ... Respondents 1to3/Respondents
1to3/Plaintiffs
4.Santhammal
5.Lakshmi
6.Rajammal
7.Anjalam
8.Thenmozhi
9.Minor Kasthuri
Rep. By her Next friend and Guardian
Mother Anjalam ...Respondents 4to9/
Respondents 4 to 9/Defendants
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 26.07.2011 in I.A.No.217 of 2011 in O.S.No.81 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sankari.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.Guruprasad
For respondents : No appearance
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner circulated a letter to the Registry informing that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties and therefore to withdraw the above Civil Revision Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Murugesan
- petitioner
M.Srinivasan
- respondent
Pavayee
- respondent
Eswaran
- respondent
Amutha
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court