Allowed

Muthupandian v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC3 Jun 2013CRL OP(MD)/8009/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons facing charges under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, and 506(ii) of the IPC. The court noted the investigation was advanced and the injured party had been discharged, and imposed strict reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties and condition to report daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

Muthupandian Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2013)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Third day of June Two Thousand Thirteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.8009 of 2013

1 MUTHUPANDIAN

2 VELLADURAICHI

3 MEENAKSHI

... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 3 TO 5

¶10

1 THE STATE REP BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE VASUDEVANALLUR POLCIE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶11

IN CRIME NO.108 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶12

For Petitioner : M/S.VEILKANIRAJU Advocate

¶13

For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI

¶14

Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶16

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶17

The petitioners/accused Nos.3 to 5 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.108 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police and hence seek anticipatory bail.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. He further submitted that the petitioners is innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case, investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail.

¶19

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application.

¶20

Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the accused Nos.1 and 2 have already been arrested and enlarged on bail and the investigation is considerably over and even

¶21

though the petitioners were not arrested, neither they interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, so I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

¶22

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri and on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶23

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶25

Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGIRI

¶28

2 -DO- THRU THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUNELVELI

¶29

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶31

VASUDEVANALLUR POLCIE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶32

+1. CC to M/S.VEILKANIRAJU Advocate SR.No.29033 AM AA/04.06.2013/2p-6c/

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Muthupandian v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthupandian v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohamed Yasin Vs the Inspector of Police

T.Lingdurai Vs Inspector of Police

Paulchamy Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

T.R. Mohanram Vs the Commissioner of Police

S.M.Muthupandi Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Varadharajan @ Kannan Vs the Inspector of Police