Single accused charged under IPC 307 sought bail. Court observed case is old, investigation over, no injuries, despite petitioner being a habitual offender. Bail granted with bond and residence conditions.
Petitioner released on bail via bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and reporting condition to Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Third day of June Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.7675 of 2013
1 S.M.MUTHUPANDI ... PETITIONER/ SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMBATHURAI POLICE STATION, DINDUGAL DISTRICT. CR. NO. 53 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S. N.SATHISH BABU Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner is Sole accused and the petitioner was arrested on 28.03.2013 for an alleged offence punishable under Section 307 of I.P.C., in Crime No. 53 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail.
03/06/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar
TO
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged under Section 307 IPC who is a habitual offender with pending cases but where investigation is considerably over.
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail given that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S.M.Muthupandi
The State
R. Mala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
