Allowed

Sudharsanam v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Dec 2013CRL OP(MD)/20621/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court allowed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The petitioner, apprehending arrest for alleged offences under IPC and a Tamil Nadu Ordinance despite no registered FIR, was ordered released on personal bond and sureties with conditions to appear before police daily for a fortnight.

What did the court decide?

Order to be released on bail upon arrest or appearance before the Magistrate on executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and complying with conditions to appear before police.

Sudharsanam Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2013)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Sixth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.20621 of 2013

¶6

SUDHARSANAM ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

¶7

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶8

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) I.P.C. and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Ordinance 2003, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has nothing to do with the alleged offence.

¶15

Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that no F.I.R. has been registered against the petitioner, but on the basis of the complaint received from the de-facto complainant, enquiry is pending.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State and also perused the materials available on record.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai and on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 11.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶20

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶21

/ TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKKOTTAI.

¶25

2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR @ SRIVILLIPUTHUR

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT.

¶27

4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

+1. CC to M/S.R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate SR.No.60952.

¶29

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20621 of 2013

¶30

msm 10.12.2013 p2-6c

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sudharsanam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudharsanam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chellakali Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

A.G.Sakthi Vs the Inspector of Police

Ravi Vs the Inspector of Police

Duraipandi Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

J.Yakya Narayanan Vs the Inspector of Police

Vs