Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail was granted to a petitioner who was initially not named as an accused but was subsequently implicated by a co-accused's confession. The court imposed bail conditions including appearance before a judicial magistrate and submission to daily police reporting.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted; petitioner to execute bond with sureties, appear before Judicial Magistrate within 15 days, and report to police daily.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Sixth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN
CRL OP(MD) No.20128 of 2013
T.KANNAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED(RANK NOT KNOWN)
THE STATE REP.BY
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JUNCTION POLICE STATION, (CR.NO.725/2013)
... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.M.MARAN, Advocate
For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who was not originally an accused but later implicated by a co-accused's confession, is entitled to anticipatory bail.
What conditions should be imposed on the grant of anticipatory bail in this case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.KANNAN
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
M. SATHYANARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court