M. Murugan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent to register the case on the basis of the complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 17.01.2013.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Sanjay For Respondents : Mr.P.Kandasamy Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents.

¶16

It is now submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that pending enquiry is pending upon the complaint received from the petitioner, as such the respondent police is directed to complete the enquiry, after giving due notice to all the parties concerned, in the manner known to law as expeditiously as possible.

¶17

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶18

Ps Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar (Writs)

¶20

/True Copy/

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar -

¶23

2

¶24

To

¶25

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

¶26

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District.

¶27

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶28

Crl.O.P(MD)No.1404 of 2013 Dated:11.02.2013

¶29

2P/4C RPB 22.02.2013

¶30

11.02.2013

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M. Murugan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M. Murugan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanan Vs the Inspector of Police

Mrs. Satya Vs the Superintendent of Police

Shanmugakani Vs

Annamani Vs the Superintendent of Police

A.Jeyalakshmi, Vs the Superintendnet of Police

Thangamani Vs the Sub Inspector of Police