M.Murugan v. Directorate of Vigilance
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed an O.P. for registration of a case. Due to non-appearance, the Criminal Original Petition was dismissed without adjudication on merits.
Petitioner filed an O.P. for registration of a case. Due to non-appearance, the Criminal Original Petition was dismissed without adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.08.2013
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11784 of 2013
M.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai-28. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Southern Range, Alagar Kovil Main Road, Madurai-2. 3. Udhayaprabu, President, Thekkampatti Panchayat, Andipatti Union, Theni District. 4. The Block Development Officer, Andipatti Union, Theni District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition is filed under Sections 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the first and second respondents to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 26.11.2012.
For petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate(Crl.Side)
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 26.07.2013. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today also. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
ssl
To
RG.30.08.2013 2P/5C.
M.Murugan
The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption
A.Arumughaswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court