Petitions for anticipatory bail were dismissed as withdrawn on the advice of the petitioners' counsel.
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand Thirteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM
CRL OP(MD)Nos.11704, 11705, 11707 & 13425 of 2013
DURAI PANDIAN ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) IN ALL THE PETITIONS
Vs.
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CRIME BRANCH, PALAYAMKOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI CITY.
CRIME NOS.1868 & 1866 OF 2012 AND 394 & 526/2013)
..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN ALL THE PETITIONS
For Petitioner : M/S.R.ANAND Advocate in all the Petitions
For Respondent : Mrs.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
in all the Petitions
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners these petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. sd/-
12/09/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO
1 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD)Nos.11704, 11705, 11707 & 13425 of 2013 Date :12/09/2013 PBK 17/09/2013 1P/3C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DURAI PANDIAN
STATE
C.T. SELVAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
