Natarajan v. v.Chinnasami
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 1.2.2006
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.NAGAPPAN
A.S.No.1006 of 1990
Natarajan .. Appellant/Plaintiff
-Vs-
1.V.Chinnasami
2.Sutharathinam
3. Maragatham
4.Manimekalai
5.Periyasami Naidu ..Respondents/Defendants
Appeal filed under Section 96 C.P.C. against the judgment and
decree, dated 18.11.1988, passed in O.S.No.69 of 1985 on the file
of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur.
For appellant : Mr.K.Kuppusamy
For respondents
1, 3 to 5 : Mr.S.Gopalratnam
JUDGMENT
It is reported that the sole appellant died in July,
2005. No steps have been taken to bring on record the
Legal Representatives. Hence, the appeal abates.
1.2.2006
vks
Sd/
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst.Registrar
To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur.
2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.
1 cc to Mr.R.Nandakumar, Advocate, SR.3954
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Natarajan
- respondent
V. Chinnasami
- respondent
Sutharathinam
- respondent
Maragatham
- respondent
Manimekalai
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court