High Court directed the first respondent to consider petitioners' representations on seniority within four weeks, aligning with a prior Supreme Court decision, and disposed of the writ petitions.
Direct the first respondent to consider the petitioners' representations on seniority within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA W.P(MD)Nos.9663 and 9664 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 1 of 2011
.. Petitioner in W.P.9663/2011 .. Petitioner in W.P.9664/2011
Vs.
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Administration,
Fort St.George,Chennai.
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents particularly the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.02.2010 and 25.08.2010 respectively in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India made in appeal (civil) No.9628 of 2006, dated 08.04.2009 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham
For Respondents: Mr.Aaiyram K.Selvakumar, Govt.Advocate
COMMON ORDER
The petitioners have come forward with these petitions seeking for the relief of directing the respondents, particularly the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 17.02.2010 and 25.08.2010 respectively in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India made in Appeal (Civil) No.9628 of 2006, dated 08.04.2009 and pass appropriate orders.
2
17.02.2010 and 25.08.2010 respectively in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Appeal (Civil).No.9628 of 2006, dated 08.04.2009 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.With the above direction, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
SD
ASST REGISTRAR(RTI ACT)
/TRUE COPY/
SUB ASST REGISTRAR
MPK
To
2 ccs To The Special Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai in SR Nos.42913, 42914.
SB:20/12/2011 2P 6C
W.P(MD)Nos.9663 and 9664 of 2011
01.12.2011
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to consider the petitioners' representations regarding seniority in light of the Supreme Court's decision.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Appeal (Civil).No.9628 of 2006, dated 08.04.2009Referred¶15
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Ananthian
P.Ayyavoo
The Government of Tamil Nadu
The Principal Secretary & Commissioner of Revenue & Administration
The District Collector
K.N.Basha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court