Petitioner challenged his transfer as Sanitary Supervisor, citing medical issues and lack of consent. Court directed District Collector to consider representation by specified deadline.
Direction to District Collector to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation submitted via dated 18.06.2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.09.2011
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.(MD).No.10610 of 2011
M.Muthuvel : Petitioner
Vs.
The District Collector, Karur District, Karur. : Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 18.06.2011 and consequently, to reconsider the transfer order dated 21.05.2011 and transfer the petitioner in Nangavaram Town Panchayat.
For Petitioner: Mr.P.Arun Jayatram
For Respondent : Mr.B.Pugalendhi, Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Pleadings and material on records disclose that by an order dated 21.05.2011, the petitioner working as a Sanitary Supervisor, Nangavaram Town Panchayat, has been transferred to Puliyur Town Panchayat. Three other persons were also transferred along with him on their request and, therefore, dearness allowance has been denied.
costs.
SD
ASST REGISTRAR ( RTI Act ) /TRUE COPY/
SML
SUB ASST REGISTRAR
To:: The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.
DM::2011:OCTOBER:::10:: Order made in W.P.(MD).No.10610 of 2011 1p:2c:: Dated:- 19.09.2011
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the District Collector should reconsider the transfer order considering the petitioner's medical condition and tenure?
Whether the petitioner is entitled to reassignment to his original post due to medical grounds?
Whether dearness allowance was correctly denied to the transferred employees?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NoneReferred
(2011) 11 JUJ 150 Mad
3 provisions across 3 enactments
M.Muthuvel
The District Collector, Karur District
S.Manikumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
