The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition where the petitioner challenged the suspension of his driving licence, noting that he had already filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner of Regional Transport under applicable rules, making the writ petition impermissible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.(MD).No.10248 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011
D.Saravanan : Petitioner
Vs.
The Regional Transport Officer, The Regional Transport Office, Madurai North, Madurai. : Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in 43420/A4/2011, dated 29.06.2011 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to return the petitioner's original driving licence.
For Petitioner : Mr.Asai Thambi For Mr.V.Nagendran
For Respondent : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader
ORDER ******
Mr.Asai Thambi, who is the one of the learned counsel on record, has sought for adjournment.
2
sd/-
Deputy Registrar (Writs)
/True Copy/
Assistant Registrar
To
The Regional Transport Officer, The Regional Transport Office, Madurai North, Madurai.
Order made in
W.P.(MD).No.10248 of 2011
09.09.2011
SML RJ/26.9.11 2p/3c
D.Saravanan
The Regional Transport Officer, The Regional Transport Office, Madurai North, Madurai
S.Manikumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
