Mohammed Kuinhi v. Tahasildar Hosdurg
Case brief
What is this about?
A 2013 writ petition before the Kerala High Court was found to be infructuous and was accordingly dismissed by the judge without any further examination or action.
A 2013 writ petition before the Kerala High Court was found to be infructuous and was accordingly dismissed by the judge without any further examination or action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 9192 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
MOHAMMED KUINHI
AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.C.H.ABDULLA
RESIDING AT WHITE HOUSE, KALLORAVI NORTH,
KANHANGAD SOUTH PO, KASARGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH
RESPONDENTS:
1 TAHASILDAR HOSDURG TALUK OFFICE, HOSDURG, KANHANGAD, KASARGOD DISTRICT-6713152 THE VILLAGE OFFICER KANHANGAD VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARGOD DISTRICT3 KANHANGAD MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE KANHANGAD, KANHANGAD P.O. BY ADV T.K.VIPINDAS SRI.B.S.SYAMANTAK, GPTHIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No.9192/2013
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
W.P.(C).No.9192 of 2013
--------------------------------------------Dated this the 12th day of April, 2024
JUDGMENT
When this writ petition came up for consideration,
the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
prayers in this writ petition are infructuous.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
JUDGE
JV
Mohammed Kuinhi
Tahasildar Hosdurg Taluk Office
The Village Officer Kanhangad Village
Kanhangad Municipality
P.V. Kunhikrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court