Dr. Ommen v. the Addl. Excise Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition of 2013 dismissed as withdrawn on the counsel's request; decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 6564 OF 2013
PETITIONERS:
1 DR. OMMEN, PROPRIETOR, AMBOLIL ARYA VAIDYAASALA, PATHANAPURAM.
2 MURALEEDHARAN NAIR, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR, KALAYIL VEETIL, KURUMPAKARA P.O, ENADIMANGALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST.BY ADV SRI.V.SETHUNATH
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE ADDL. EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.2 THE DEPUTY EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 001.3 THE EXCISE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, EXICSE CIRCLE OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA, PIN – 691 506.4 THE INSPECTOR, EXCISE RANGE, EZHUKONE, PIN – 691 505.5 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.BY ADVS.
SRI.VENUGOPAL V, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 6564 OF 2013
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the writ petition.
In the light of the permission sought by the learned counsel
for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/GOPINATH P. JUDGE
DK
Dr. Ommen, Proprietor, Ambolil Arya Vaidyaasala, Pathanapuram
Muraleedharan Nair
The Addl. Excise Commissioner, Thiruvananthapuram
The Deputy Excise Commissioner, Kollam
The Excise Circle Inspector, Excise Circle Office, Kottarakkara
The Inspector, Excise Range, Ezhukone
GOPINATH P
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court