A.Sulfikar v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCWP(C)/3377/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A decade-old writ petition concerning a petitioner running a provision store was closed for lack of instructions, with liberty noted to seek reopening if a grievance subsists.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 3377 OF 2013
¶5
PETITIONER:
¶6
A.SULFIKAR,
AGED 25 YEARS,
S/O. ABDUL KHAREEM, RESIDING AT VAZHATHOPPIL HOUSE,
KAZHUTHURUTHY POST, ARYANKAVU, PUNALUR,
KOLLAM DISTRICT.
(PROPRIETOR, ARSHAD PROVISION STORE, KAZHUTHURUTHY.)
¶7
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.M.RAMAN KARTHA
SRI.ARUN BASIL
SMT.K.N.SREEDEVI
¶8
RESPONDENTS:
¶9
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001.
¶10
2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM-691 001.
¶11
3 TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, PATHANAPURAM-689 695.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
A. Sulfikar
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
District Collector, Kollam
- respondent
Taluk Supply Officer, Pathanapuram
- respondent
Sub Inspector of Police, Thenmala Police Station
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court