Petitioners absent on repeated calls; writ petition dismissed for default as the Court suspected they were no longer interested in prosecuting it.
None granted; petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 5497 OF 2019
PETITIONERS:
BY ADV P.V.VENUGOPAL
RESPONDENTS:
WP(C) NO. 5497 OF 2019
2
8 SUGUNAN S/O.KARTHIKEYAN, GAYAM, PAVITHRESWARAM.P.O., PUTHOOR, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.SASIKUMAR SRI.R.MOHANA BABU SRI.M.AJITH (KARICODE) SRI.N.P.PRADEEP SRI.S.ARAVIND
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 5497 OF 2019
3
JUDGMENT
Even though this matter was called more than twice today, there was no representation for the petitioners and I, therefore, suspect that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter any further.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
stu
Ganesh.K
Manaoj B
Deputy Inspector General of Registration (Licensing), Thiruvananthapuram
Gopalan.A.
Ramachandran
Narayanan.A. @ Maranad Narayanan
Devan Ramachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
