Writ petition called on for admission; no representation appeared for the petitioner despite the matter being called more than twice. The court suspected lack of interest in prosecuting the matter and dismissed the writ petition for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 4190 OF 2019
PETITIONER:
SHANKARAN, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O KANDAN, VALLIPPARAMBIL KIZHAKKETHIL, PONGALADI, PARANDHAL, ADOOR
R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL
RESPONDENTS:
SRI.K.SASIKUMAR SRI.R.MOHANA BABU SRI.S.ARAVIND SRI.N.P.PRADEEP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 4190 OF 2019
2
JUDGMENT
Even though this matter was called more than twice today, there was no representation for the petitioner and I, therefore, suspect that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter any further.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
stu
Shankaran
Deputy Inspector General of Registration (Licensing)
Gopalan.A
K. Kesavan
Maranadu Narayanan
Pathanapuram Narayanan
Devan Ramachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
