Disposed

Malavika.a.S. v. Director of General Education

Kerala HC10 Jan 2024WP(C)/480/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Student denied first rank at District School Kalolsavam challenged dismissal of her appeal and sought State Kalolsavam participation. She was allowed provisional participation under an interim order but did not secure the top three ranks. The Court confirmed the interim order, directing grant of collateral benefits like grace marks from her performance.

What did the court decide?

Interim order confirmed; authorities directed to grant benefits/grace marks due from petitioner's State Kalolsavam performance as per law.

Malavika.a.S. Vs Director of General Education — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 20TH POUSHA, 1945

¶5

WP(C) NO. 480 OF 2024

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

MALAVIKA.A.S.
AGED 14 YEARS
D/O SHEEJA.P.S., SWATHI , T.C NO: 17/354/1, CHADIYARA,
NEAR POOJAMANTAPAM, POOJAPURA (P.O.),
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA- 695 012, REPRESENTED BY
HER MOTHER SHEEJA.P.S., AGED 38, W/O ANAND.V.G.,
SWATHI , T.C NO: 17/354/1, CHADIYARA, NEAR
POOJAMANTAPAM, POOJAPURA (P.O.), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
KERALA, PIN - 695012
BY ADV K.RAJESH KANNAN

¶8

RESPONDENTS:

¶9

1 DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION O/O THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014

¶10

2 KALOLSAVAM COMMITTEE CONVENOR/ DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PADMAVILASOM ROAD, FORT (P.O.), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695029

¶11

3 CHAIRMAN, APPEAL COMMITTEE/ DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM O/O THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PADMAVILASOM ROAD, FORT (P.O.), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695029 SRI. SUNIL K.KURIAKOSE, GP

¶12

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

WP(C) NO. 480 OF 2024 2

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

The petitioner says that she participated in an event in the ‘District School Kalolsavam’, but was not awarded the First Rank; thus denying her the opportunity of moving to the next level, namely the ‘State Kalolsavam’, which has now been completed.

¶16

The petitioner asserts that the results of the ‘District Level Kalolsavam’ were egregiously improper and therefore, that she preferred an Appeal before the Statutory Appellate Committee, as is provided under the Manual relating to the ‘Revenue District Kalolsavam’; but that the said Committee has rejected it, through the impugned order, without citing tenable reasons, but on hyper technical grounds.

¶17

The petitioner, therefore, prays that the impugned order be set aside and that she be allowed to participate in the ‘Kerala State School Kalolsavam’.

¶18

Hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner in this case, at the time when this matter was considered for admission and adverting to the allegations and assertions made and contentions impelled, this Court passed an interim order, allowing the petitioner to participate in the ‘State Kalolsavam’, however, clarifying that it will only be provisional. It was also made clear in the said order that, if the

¶19

WP(C) NO. 480 OF 2024 3

¶20

petitioner is to obtain Rank Nos.1, 2 or 3, same shall be declared only after obtaining orders from this Court.

¶21

The ‘State School Kalolsavam’ was completed on 08.01.2024 and this Court is now told that the petitioner has not obtained any of the first three ranks; and that all results have been declared, with the Kannur District being adjudged the Cup Winner.

¶22

Obviously, therefore, all which now remains is to consider whether the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of any grace marks that she may obtain through her performance, pursuant to the interim order of this Court.

¶23

Though, as I have already said above, the interim order clearly provided that the performance of the petitioner would be provisional, I am of the view that since she has performed, any resultant benefit that can inure to her, ought not to be denied. This is because, the best that the petitioner would obtain is only grace marks, depending upon whether she has obtained ‘A Grade’ or otherwise; and I do not think that it will be justified for this Court to deny that to the contestants, solely for the reason that her Appeal had been dismissed at the ‘Revenue District School Kalolsavam’ level. The interim order by this Court was issued after due thought and finding a prima facie case in favour of the petitioner; but since she has not been able to obtain

¶24

WP(C) NO. 480 OF 2024 4

¶25

the first of the three ranks, I am of the firm view that it would not be necessary for this Court to enter into the merits of any other rival contentions.

¶26

Obviously, therefore, all which this Court has to now do is to confirm the interim order, so that the petitioner would obtain all collateral benefits entitled, based on her performance in the ‘State Level Kalolsavam’.

¶27

In the afore circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of, confirming the interim order granted by this Court earlier and directing the Authorities to grant all benefits that may be entitled to the petitioner, if any, based on her performance, as per law.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶30

JUDGE

¶31

MC/16.1

¶32

WP(C) NO. 480 OF 2024 5

¶33

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 480/2024

¶34

PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER
NO.C(4)/8910/2023/D.D.E DATED 27.12.2023
ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Malavika.a.S. v. Director of General Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malavika.a.S. v. Director of General Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Diya.S.L. Vs Director of General Education

Ananya Aravindan Vs Director of General Education

M. v Vishwanathan Vs Kerala Water Authority

Shivani S Nair Vs the Deputy Director of Education

M/S. Malabar Constructions Vs State of Kerala

Kerala Water Authority Represented by Its Managing Director Vs Reena Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. 602