Writ petition concerning pension-related service matters was taken up; counsel for the petitioner stated it had become infructuous. The High Court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous, deciding nothing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 365 OF 2018
PETITIONER/S:
RAJAN. G. PINAYUVILA PINARVILA VEEDU, VETTIPUZHA, PUNALUR, KOLLAM - 691 305.
BY ADVS. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR SMT.P.LISSY JOSE.
RESPONDENT/S:
DSGI, SRI. SAYED M. THANGAL, G. P.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.C. No.365 of 2018
2
EASWARAN S. , J.
W.P.C. No.365 of 2018
Dated this the 24th day of May 2024
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- EASWARAN S. JUDGE
NS
Rajan. G.
The Deputy Accountant General (A&RS)
The Commercial Tax Officer
Easwaran S.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
