Dr. Ommen, v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel stated the petitioner did not wish to prosecute the writ petition; the court dismissed it as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 31149 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
DR. OMMEN, AGED 57 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, AMBOLIL ARYA VAIDYAASALA, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O T.J MATHAI, AMBOLIL VILLA, ENADIMANGALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST, PATHANAPURAM.P.O., PIN: 689695
BY ADVS. V.SETHUNATH V.R.MANORANJAN (MUVATTUPUZHA)
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES (EXCISE) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN: 695001.
- 2 THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, EXCISE HEADQUARTERS, BAKERY JCT RD, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS, NANDAVANAM, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN: 695033
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DR. OMMEN
- respondent
THE STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER
- respondent
THE JOINT EXCISE COMMISSIONER (SOUTH ZONE)
- respondent
THE DEPUTY EXCISE COMMISSIONER, PATHANAMTHITTA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court