Writ petition over land classification matters; counsel for petitioners stated it had become infructuous and the court dismissed it as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 22606 OF 2015
PETITIONERS:
1 THOMAS ANTONY, THANIYATH HOUSE, ERATTAPATTY, POYYA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.2 LIJI THOMAS, W/O.THOMAS ANTONY, THANIYATH HOUSE, ERATTAPATTY, POYYA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.RAJESH SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMANRESPONDENTS:
1 THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, POYYA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, P.O.POYYA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680733, REPRESENTED BY IT'S CONVENER, THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHIBHAVAN, POYYA,PULIPARAMBU, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 733.2 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHIBHAVAN, POYYA, PULIPARAMBU, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 733.3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MADATHUMPADI VILLAGE OFFICE, P.O.MADATHUMPADI,THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN – 680 733. BY ADVS.SRI.VENUGOPAL V, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 22606 OF 2015
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the
writ petition has become infructuous.
In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for
the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/GOPINATH P. JUDGE
DK
Thomas Antony
Liji Thomas
The Local Level Monitoring Committee, Poyya Grama Panchayat
The Agricultural Officer, Krishibhavan, Poyya
The Village Officer, Madathumpadi Village Office
Gopinath P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court