Writ petition concerning Employees Provident Fund Organisation benefits was closed as covered by the Supreme Court judgment in Sunil Kumar B, on the EPFO's standing counsel's submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 27TH POUSHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 14231 OF 2020
PETITIONER:
NEELAKANTAN NAMBOODIRI C.R.
S/O.RAMAN NAMBOOTHIRI,
THANAL, THRIKKAKARA, ERNAKULAM-682 021.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.N.MOHANAN
SRI.C.P.SABARI
SMT.AMRUTHA SURESH
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA (UOI) REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI-110 001.2 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO), BHAVISHANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 004.3 ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO), BHAVISHANIDHI BHAVAN, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM-682 017.4 EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUSTEE, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING TRUSTEE, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, WAZIRPUR, NEW DELHI-110 052.5 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-1 (PENSION), BHAVISHYA NITHI BHAVAN, 14-BHIKAJI CAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI-110 066.W.P.(C)No.14231/2020
2
6MANAGING DIRECTOR,
KERALA STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
VELLAYAMBALAM, KELTRON HOUSE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
BY ADVS.
SRI.HARIDAS P.NAIR, CGC
SMT.NITA N.S (SC-EPFO)
SRI. S MANU (DSGI)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 17.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)No.14231/2020
3
JUDGMENT
The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Employees Provident Fund Organization would submit that the matter stands covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in The Employees Provident Fund Organization & Anr. v. Sunil Kumar B & Others; 2022 (6) KLT 234.
In the light of the judgment in Sunil Kumar B & Others (Supra) , the writ petition will stand closed.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P. JUDGE
ats
W.P.(C)No.14231/2020
4
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14231/2020
RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT R2(a)TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED
04/11/2022 IN SLP(C)No. 8659 OF 2019
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT |
P1A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED04.11.2011 IN W.P.(C)NO.6643/2007. |
|---|---|
EXHIBIT |
P2A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31.03.2016IN SLP NO.7074/2014. |
EXHIBIT |
P3A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED20.02.2007 ISSUED BY THE SECONDRESPONDENT. |
EXHIBIT |
P4A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED12.10.2018 IN WP(c)NO.30083/2016. |
EXHIBIT |
P5A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 01.04.2019IN SLP NO.9610/2019. |
EXHIBIT |
P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED25.02.2020 IN WP(C)NO.28110/2019. |
EXHIBIT |
P7A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED18.06.2020 IN R.P.NO.348/2020. |
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
The Employees Provident Fund Organization & Anr. v. Sunil Kumar B & OthersFollowed
2022 (6) KLT 234
Neelakantan Namboodiri C.R.
Union of India (UOI) represented by the Secretary to Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour and Department of Employment
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, EPFO, Thiruvananthapuram
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub Regional Office, EPFO, Ernakulam
Employees Provident Fund Trustee
Managing Director, Kerala State Electronics Development Corporation
Gopinath P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court